When “Free” Advice Costs You $1.5 Million in Healthcare Spend
Kirk Conole • April 24, 2026
For many businesses, healthcare is one of the largest and fastest-growing expenses on the balance sheet. Yet the way most companies manage it hasn’t changed in decades.
A recent case we worked on highlights just how costly that can be.
The Situation
A company with 290 employees
received their renewal from Blue Cross Blue Shield.
The projected increase: 16.99%
That pushed their expected annual healthcare spend to approximately:
👉 $5.5 million
For a group of this size, that number should raise eyebrows.
But unfortunately, it’s becoming more common, not less.

Why This Keeps Happening
Most employers rely on their broker to:
- Shop the market
- Negotiate rates
- Present plan options
And to be fair, most brokers are
doing those things.
The issue is how
they’re doing them.
In a traditional fully insured model, “shopping” typically means moving between the same handful of carriers:
- Blue Cross Blue Shield
- UnitedHealthcare
- Aetna
- Cigna
Each year becomes a cycle:
- Receive a large increase
- Shop the market
- Shift carriers or adjust plans
- Repeat next year
This approach may create the appearance
of cost control, but it rarely produces meaningful, long-term savings.
The Real Problem: A Reactive Strategy
The traditional model is reactive by design.
Employers are:
- Responding to renewals instead of controlling them
- Accepting trend increases as unavoidable
- Operating with limited visibility into what’s driving costs
Without transparency and a proactive strategy, costs will continue to rise, regardless of how often the plan is “shopped.”
A Different Approach
Instead of simply remarketing the plan, we helped this client rethink their healthcare strategy entirely.
By implementing a more strategic and data-driven approach, we were able to:
👉 Reduce total annual healthcare spend from $5.5 million to $4 million
That’s a $1.5 million reduction, achieved without cutting benefits or shifting additional burden to employees.
So… Is Your Broker Really “Free”?
Many employers believe their broker services come at no cost.
Technically, that’s true; there’s no direct invoice.
But broker compensation is typically built into your premiums.
Which means:
If your current approach results in millions of dollars in unnecessary spend…
you’re still paying for it, just indirectly.
The Cost of Staying the Same
If your organization is:
- Experiencing annual increases of 10% or more
- Remaining fully insured without exploring alternatives
- Relying solely on market “shopping”
There’s a strong chance you’re overpaying for healthcare.
And over time, those incremental increases compound into millions.
A Better Question to Ask
Instead of asking:
“Did we shop the market this year?”
Consider asking:
“Do we have a strategy to control our healthcare costs long-term?”
That shift in thinking is where real savings begin.
A Final Thought
Healthcare costs don’t rise because employers aren’t trying hard enough.
They rise because most are operating within a system that wasn’t designed to control them.
If your projected spend is approaching $5M+ for a 300-employee group, it may be time to rethink the strategy, not just the carrier.
Let's Talk
At DCI Solutions, we help companies take a more strategic approach to healthcare — one that prioritizes transparency, control, and measurable savings.
If you’re questioning your current trajectory, we’re happy to have a conversation.

For decades, employers have been conditioned to believe that health insurance claims reports are the key to understanding healthcare costs. They're not. In fact, by the time most employers receive a claims report, the information is already historical. It tells you what happened, not what's likely to happen next. That's a problem when healthcare spending continues to rise and employers are being asked to make critical decisions about funding strategies, stop-loss coverage, network selection, and employee benefits.

Recently, I ended a 66-hour fast by attempting the most rigorous physical challenge of my life: carrying 170 pounds for a full mile in 45 minutes while breathing only through my nose. Painful? Absolutely. Glorious? Without question. Why would anyone willingly do something like that? Because difficult challenges reveal truth. They expose weakness, sharpen discipline, and force you to operate at a higher standard. And the same principle applies in business, especially in areas where millions of dollars are quietly lost through poor oversight, outdated strategies, and low expectations. At DCI Solutions, we see this constantly when organizations evaluate brokers, vendors, and healthcare advisors. Most firms claim to deliver savings. Few can withstand rigorous scrutiny. That’s why, when clients consider replacing their current broker or benefits advisor, we encourage them to ask deeper questions, questions that go far beyond surface-level promises and standard renewals.

Most companies accept annual freight increases as unavoidable. FedEx Freight’s LTL general rate increased 5.9% from 2023 to 2024, and then another 5.9% from 2024 to 2025. Over time, these annual General Rate Increases (GRIs) quietly compound into a major expense line that most businesses never fully challenge. But what if you could reverse the impact of those increases?

Employee engagement determines a company’s health and profitability. Across a wide number of companies, Gallup reports that the level of employee engagement follows a “1/6 : 2/6 : 3/6” ratio. 1 out of 6 employees (including management) resist the ownership’s goals and vision. 2 out of 6 support the ownership’s goals and vision. 3 out of 6 are “neutral.” They can be swayed by either the “resisters” or the “supporters.” Owners and executives should understand that they are competing every day with the “resisting “1 /6” to win over the neutral “3 / 6” and to sustain supportive engagement from the “2/6.” To improve the chances of winning this competition, leaders should recognize and avoid two common flaws: FLAW #1: CRITICAL LEADERSHIP “Critical Leadership” results in staff feeling less than fully appreciated if not rewarded for taking informed but unrequired risks that could be in the best interest of the company’s ownership. Example: The CFO and the controller of a privately held company understood how a specialized tax credit and cost review would recover substantial amounts of cash. “The problem,” he said behind closed doors, “is the owner of this company would criticize us for not being able to find this money all by ourselves without you. We can’t have that.” In this example, the company owners and all of the “stakeholders” lose valuable cash because an “Insufficiently Engaged Employee” didn’t want to accept what was misperceived as personal risk. FLAW #2: REMOTE LEADERSHIP The best leadership is close enough to offer clear guidance, incentives and accountability to ensure the organization’s health and profitability. When personal attention is too remote for too long a period of time, the important opportunities that should be first brought to the owner/CEO for an informed decision and then implemented by the staff are ignored or blocked. Instead, those opportunities are left for the staff to review and pursue or ignore according to their “personal perspective” and desire to avoid “personal risk.” This “Abdelegation” (combination of delegation mixed with abdication) is why too many great decisions and gains don’t get made in time, if ever. Example: For the last few years, an AP audit/recovery service recovered millions for a Fortune 1000 company. In response to a corporate directive to cut costs, the accounting department either had to let go of a well-liked staff member or discontinue the AP audit/recovery service, which was paying for itself many times over. The department discontinued the service. The company is now in worse financial condition than when the accounting department was asked to cut costs. Penny-wise and pound-foolish? Obviously, YES! But when given the opportunity to save jobs, many people will do so – even when it hurts the company and the common good. In both cases the decisions made by executives and staff were inline chiefly with the best interests of the company’s management personnel rather than the company or the company’s owner(s). The alternative is to replace the perspective of being overbearing and remote bosses to apply a leadership practice that causes employees to perceive them not as bosses, but as “Fully Engaged Employee-Centered Leaders.” To lead better, an owner/CEO should start with the assumption that the employer’s profitability is still secondary to other work-related priorities held by his VPs and department heads. Their priorities include: job security, career advancement, autonomy, peace, compensation (pay benefits, flex time), recognition (office relationships, peer respect, recognition from superiors), personal development, and the avoidance of more stress/work for which there is no extra reward. One simple improvement leaders can use to improve employee engagement and corporate profits simultaneously is DCI’s “3-A Communication.” The 3-A’s are: Align. Show how your decisions/goals align with employee well being and with the big picture. Affirm. Show respect and care for those touched by your decisions. Assign. Clarify roles, expectations and rewards for people carrying out your decisions. As an example, clients of DCI use this memo which incorporates “3-A Leadership” principles: Our executive team is committed to continually improving our employee well being with cost structure and financial health without reducing the quality of the services we give or the services we deliver to our consumers. To achieve these goals, we have engaged DCI Solutions to identify opportunities within our tax and overhead structure for additional discounts, credits, and refunds. Their mandate is to help us see worthwhile recoveries and cost savings without creating any risk for or unreasonable burdens on our staff. At some point DCI may request your time or input in order to expedite a savings for the good of our company. Your cooperation in this matter is necessary and appreciated. The resulting success reflects well on each department and person involved. The more effective DCI is in saving money for the company, the more profits we will have to grow our business and bonus our people. If you have any questions, concerns, or needs that cannot best be addressed by DCI Solutions directly, please feel free to contact us: info@dcisolutions.net | 760-809-8734

If you could see a ranking of business owners and executives who best control healthcare costs and then designate the “top 1%,” you would have to include Susan, the owner of a retail chain in the Midwest. Susan is a “one percenter” in controlling healthcare costs for three reasons: 1) She commits to thinking rationally about healthcare. 100% of rational, fact-driven business owners and executives tend not to view healthcare costs with the same rational approach they apply to other significant expenses. Unlike other expenses, health insurance directly affects employees who are seldom educated adequately on how win/win scenarios can benefit both employee and employer at the same time. Usually, the employee expects the employer to have the best answers but the employer is under-resourced and assumes that a commissioned salesperson, the health insurance broker, will be able to figure it out with input from the HR department. The HR department is motivated to have all employees happy and not complaining. HR is also motivated to show that costs are not escalating dramatically year over year. All brokers want to keep the client and most want to keep the current level of commission – a motivation that too often automatically separates the broker’s interests from the client’s. “Some owners see a broker the way tribal villagers see the village shaman,” Susan shared with me. “He’s the guy who interprets the dark secrets, and saves the employees who wholly trust him alone to deal with the things they don’t understand. This gives employees a sense of safety and security.” After gaining a full understanding of healthcare costs without the “help” of her previous retail broker, Susan had an interesting way of dealing with that broker. “I threw him off the porch,” she said. 2) She has owner/HR alignment. Both Susan and her HR department must: a) share an objective understanding of all healthcare cost drivers, and b) master the best alternatives for reducing costs. Their ability to be fully engaged and aligned, which is more than mere agreement, is the second factor that makes Susan a member of the one percent. We aren’t suggesting they must do all of this on their own. They can rely on the truly UNBIASED insight and ongoing support of DCI. 3) Her total cost puts her in the one percent. The total cost of healthcare is more than just the premium amounts. The true cost of healthcare is: TOTAL PREMIUMS FOR THE EMPLOYEE ONLY (EMPLOYER & EMPLOYEE SHARE) PLUS ALL ADDITIONAL PREMIUMS PAID BY EMPLOYEE OR EMPLOYER TO COVER DEPENDENTS PLUS ALL DEDUCTIBLES AND COPAYS PAID BY THE EMPLOYER AND THE EMPLOYEE. Add up those three component numbers then divide the sum by the total number of employees in your plan. What do you get? For companies in the bottom 50% of cost-efficiency, this number will be greater than $12,000 per employee per year (PEPY) . For companies in the top 50%, this number may be closer to $8,000 PEPY. One percenters like Susan are well under $5,000 PEPY. If you don’t already know your full cost on a PEPY basis, do the math yourself now or call DCI to perform the math with zero bias. It might be true that no one besides your retail broker could possibly reduce costs any lower and without sacrificing quality, but why risk it? Before your company commits to another year of unnecessarily high costs, contact DCI. Our solutions and strategies do not require you to switch brokers or networks and you don’t have to reduce coverage or increase employee deductibles. Our analyses give you the insight and power to be a one percenter! info@dcisolutions.net | 760-809-8734

When it comes to SEO, there isn't a magic formula to instantly send your site off to the #1 search result on Google. But there are some basic principles you should follow for a wonderful starting point. Here are the top 5 SEO practices to start with: #1 Write for people, not for search engines Always write original, interesting, high quality site content that's error free and relevant to your site. Search engines like Google can easily detect content that is duplicated from elsewhere online, that contains grammatical errors, or that is stuffed with keywords. #2 Add a blog to your site and use rich media To engage your site visitors and blog readers, create posts that include non-textual media like photos, videos, or original visualizations (infographics). Having that extra content (especially if it's captivating) will increase the time users spend on your site as well as the likelihood they will share your site with their own community. #3 Offer a positive user experience throughout your site Google will know if you're using your site to aggressively advertise your service, or if you're being too pushy. Always aim to offer site visitors a pleasant experience on your site. That means clear content, support when needed, and always an option to go back. #4 Create a network of internal links (but don't overdo it) Add links between different pages of your site and your blog, but try to follow a process that feels organic rather than heavy linking meant just for search engine crawlers. Link between pages that make sense, for example, on your services page, link a certain industry specific term, and link it to a blog post you wrote about it, that gives more information on that term. #5 Always check your site's Core Web Vitals Core Web Vitals are a standard site performance standard initially created by Google. The report shows site owners how their site pages perform 'for real,' how long it takes for site visitors to load site pages, and it offers ways to fix issues, if there are any.

Trying to grow into the middle market? Many business owners make the mistake of giving the “CFO” title to the overworked, under-equipped accounting manager. When a loyal, affordable accounting manager who lacks the ability to forecast future performance and resource requirements is made the CFO you might see these warning signs: WARNING SIGNS: Closings are consistently late and you don’t know why. Your bank covenants are never on time and you have a hard time getting funding. Your business valuation is below average for your market. Your repeatedly have unexpected cash shortages. You don’t really understand your financial statements. You don’t know what results to expect in the next 6-12 months. Employers with less than $10MM revenue who want to triple revenues should get high-level, strategic CFO guidance, even if part time. The right CFO talent will pay for the added salary cost many times over. The Fractional CFO The most cost-efficient way for many medium sized businesses to grow into the middle market is to deploy a top talent CFO on a part-time basis. How do you know when you’ve chosen the right fractional CFO? The first way you know is that the six warning signs disappear. The other way you know is when you say to your fractional CFO: “Ever since you came onboard, I know more about my business than I ever did!” WHEN TO CONSIDER A FULL-TIME CFO Business owners who want to further increase their cost efficiency use DCI’s Cost Efficiency dashboard. To learn how this increases profit and market value up to 10%, contact DCI Solutions at: info@dcisolutions.net | 760-809-8734


